|
Functional examination of retinal vessels in patients with central
retinal vein occlusion.
Cesk Slov Oftalmol.
2007 Apr;63(2):95-102.
Retina vessel
analyzer (RVA) provides the functional examination of retinal vessels
based on the analysis of the extent (size) of their dilation and
constriction. The RVA measures continuously on-line the diameter of
retinal arteries and veins after different kind of stimulation. Beyond
dynamic vessel analysis, another possibility of the RVA's utilization
is a static vessel assessment, measuring the arterial and venous
diameter ratio (A/V ratio), which provides the information about the
rate of arterial vasoconstriction. The aim of the presented study was
to investigate static and dynamic retinal vessel changes in patients
with central retinal vein occlusion (Group 1). The second investigated
group consists of patients with arterial hypertension; as a control
group, healthy persons without any vascular disease were examined.
Altogether 40 eyes were examined. Statistically significant
differences of A/V ratio were observed in the static vessel analysis
in all three investigated groups. The dynamic analysis showed
statistically significant differences in arterial dilatation and
constriction between all investigated groups as well. The presented
results confirm that the degree of retinal vessels endothelial
dysfunction is one of the determinating ethiopathological factors of
central retinal vein occlusion.
Systemic diseases
associated with various types of retinal vein occlusion.Am
J Ophthalmol. 2001 Jan;131(1):61-77
PURPOSE: To
investigate systemic diseases associated with various types of retinal
vein occlusion. METHODS: We investigated prospectively in 1090
consecutive patients with retinal vein occlusion, almost all Caucasian
(consistent with the racial pattern here), the prevalence of
associated systemic disorders before or at the onset of various types
of retinal vein occlusion. The patients were categorized into six
types of retinal vein occlusion based on defined criteria: nonischemic
and ischemic central retinal vein occlusion, nonischemic and ischemic
hemi-central retinal vein occlusion, and major and macular branch
retinal vein occlusion. The patients had a detailed ophthalmic and
systemic evaluation according to our protocol. For data analysis,
patients were divided into three age groups: young (younger than 45
years), middle-aged (45 to 64 years), and elderly (65 years or older).
The observed prevalence rates of major systemic diseases were compared
among central retinal vein occlusion, hemi-central retinal vein
occlusion, and branch retinal vein occlusion using a polytomous
logistic regression analysis adjusting for gender and age. Logistic
regression adjusting for age and gender was also used to compare the
observed prevalence of systemic disease between nonischemic and
ischemic in central retinal vein occlusion and hemi-central retinal
vein occlusion and between major and macular branch retinal vein
occlusion. These observed prevalence rates were also compared with
those expected in a gender-matched and age-matched control population
from estimates from the US National Center for Health Statistics.
RESULTS: There was a significantly higher prevalence of arterial
hypertension in branch retinal vein occlusion compared with central
retinal vein occlusion (P < .0001) and hemi-central retinal vein
occlusion (P = .028). Branch retinal vein occlusion also had a
significantly higher prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (P =
.0002), venous disease (P = .011), peptic ulcer (P = .031), and other
gastrointestinal disease (P < .0001) compared with central retinal
vein occlusion. The proportion of patients with branch retinal vein
occlusion with cerebrovascular disease was also significantly (P =
.049) greater than that of the combined group of patients with central
retinal vein occlusion and patients with hemi-central retinal vein
occlusion. There was no significant difference in prevalence of any
systemic disease between central retinal vein occlusion and
hemi-central retinal vein occlusion. A significantly greater
prevalence of arterial hypertension (P = .025) and diabetes mellitus
(P = .011) was present in the ischemic central retinal vein occlusion
compared with the nonischemic central retinal vein occlusion.
Similarly, arterial hypertension (P = .0002) and ischemic heart
disease (P = .048) were more prevalent in major branch retinal vein
occlusion than in macular branch retinal vein occlusion. Relative to
the US white control population, the combined group of patients with
central retinal vein occlusion and patients with hemi-central retinal
vein occlusion had a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (P <
.0001), peptic ulcer (P < .0001), diabetes mellitus (in ischemic type
only, P < .0001), and thyroid disorder (P < .0001). The patients with
branch retinal vein occlusion showed a greater prevalence of arterial
hypertension (P < or = .005), cerebrovascular disease (P = .007),
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .012), peptic ulcer (P <
.0001), diabetes (in young only, P = .0005), and thyroid disorder (P =
.003) compared with the US white control population. CONCLUSIONS: The
findings of our study revealed that a variety of systemic disorders
may be present in association with different types of retinal vein
occlusion and in different age groups, and that their relative
prevalence differs significantly, so that the common practice of
generalizing about these disorders for the entire group of patients
with retinal vein occlusion can be misleading. The presence of a
particular associated systemic disease does not necessarily imply a
cause-and-effect relationship with that type of retinal vein
occlusion; the particular disease may or may not be one of the risk
factors in a multifactorial scenario predisposing an eye to develop a
particular type of retinal vein occlusion. Based on our study, we
think that apart from a routine medical evaluation, an extensive and
expensive workup for systemic diseases is unwarranted in the vast
majority of patients with retinal vein occlusion.
Intraocular pressure
abnormalities associated with central and hemicentral retinal vein
occlusion.Ophthalmology.
2004 Jan;111(1):133-41
OBJECTIVE: To
evaluate the prevalence of ocular hypertension (OHT) and glaucoma in
patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and hemi-CRVO (HCRVO)
and of the fall in intraocular pressure (IOP) secondary to CRVO/HCRVO.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS AND
METHODS: We investigated 674 consecutive patients who were initially
seen with unilateral CRVO (n = 548) and HCRVO (n = 126) at their
onset, with a normal fellow eye. The fellow uninvolved eye in each
patient acted as a control. Central retinal vein occlusion and HCRVO
were categorized into nonischemic and ischemic. At all visits,
patients had a detailed ocular history, as well as a thorough
bilateral ocular evaluation, including IOP recording with a Goldmann
applanation tonometer; when the diagnosis of OHT or glaucoma was
initially uncertain, the 24-hour diurnal IOP was recorded. The
observed prevalence rates of OHT and glaucoma among patients with CRVO
and HCRVO were compared with those in the general population. MAIN
OUTCOME MEASURES: The prevalence of OHT and glaucoma, and of ocular
hypotension secondary to CRVO/HCRVO. RESULTS: The overall prevalence
of glaucoma was 9.9% and of OHT 16.2%. The prevalence of glaucoma/OHT
was found to be significantly (P<0.0001) higher in patients with CRVO
and HCRVO than in the general population. There was no significant
difference in the proportion of patients with glaucoma/OHT among the
various types of CRVO/HCRVO (P = 0.156). Forty-eight percent of all
patients had lower IOP (>/==" BORDER="0">2 mmHg) in the CRVO/HCRVO eye
than in the fellow (uninvolved) eye at their initial evaluation. The
prevalence of ocular hypotension was significantly (P<0.0001) higher
in patients with glaucoma/OHT not on ocular hypotensive therapy than
in patients without glaucoma. Among the patients without glaucoma, the
prevalence of ocular hypotension differed significantly among the
various types of CRVO/HCRVO (P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Central retinal
vein occlusion and HCRVO have a significant association with glaucoma
and OHT and with a subsequent fall in IOP in the involved eye. Few
patients with CRVO/HCRVO have high IOP in the involved eye, although
many of them do have it in the fellow uninvolved eye. It is important
to exclude glaucoma/OHT in the fellow eye of any patient with CRVO/HCRVO;
if present, elevated IOP should be treated to reduce the risk of that
eye developing (1) CRVO/HCRVO and (2) glaucomatous damage. There may
be no benefit to prescribing IOP-lowering drops for involved eyes
whose IOP is already normal.
Central retinal vein
occlusion combined with occlusion of a cilioretinal artery. A case
report.Acta
Ophthalmol Scand. 1998 Aug;76(4):503-5
An otherwise
healthy 39-year-old man with a dark spot in the visual field of his
left eye showed retinal whitening, indicating a cilioretinal arterial
obstruction and minor signs of venous stasis at the initial
examination. The affected cilioretinal artery filled normally during
fluorescein angiography. The visual acuity was 1.0 bilaterally. One
week later, the retinal whitening had decreased and signs of central
retinal venous occlusion (venous dilatation, retinal haemorrhages and
papillary oedema) predominated in the fundus picture. The patient was
treated with oral betamethasone and acetylsalicylic acid. The patient
was free of symptoms and the fundus normalized within 10 months. The
pathogenesis of cilioretinal arterial obstruction combined with
central retinal venous occlusion is not established. The clinical
course in this case seems to favour a hypothesis of a primary arterial
affection.
|