Normal Anatomy and histology of Eye

Pathology of the Eyelid

Reporting of biopsies taken from lesions of the Eyelid

Dermoid cyst of eyelid

Retinoblastoma; 

Tumour and tumour-like lesions of the Eyelid

Adnexal Tumours of the eyelid;

Epidermal tumours of the Eyelid ;

Melanocytic tumours of the Eyelid ;

Mesenchymal Tumours of the Eyelid ;

Xanthelasma;

Chlamydial Conjunctivitis 

Onchocerciasis (River Blindness)

Loiasis

Dirofilariasis

Sarcoidosis

Paracoccidioidomycosis

PURPOSE: To describe the morphologic features of ischemic diabetic maculopathy by high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) and their correlation with the damaged foveal avascular zone (FAZ) on fluorescein angiography (FA). DESIGN: Observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-four eyes of 63 patients with diabetic retinopathy and acceptable FA and OCT images were studied.Twenty-three normal fellow eyes of 23 nondiabetic patients with unilateral acute central serous choroidopathy also were studied. METHODS: High-speed Fourier-domain OCT was used with a speckle noise-reduction technique to obtaindetailed horizontal and vertical images through the center of the fovea and horizontal raster scans every 100 microm. Foveal ganglion cell layer (GCL) damage was identified on OCT as an evident difference in foveal thickness and contour compared with a normal fovea or as asymmetry within the fovea. Fluorescein angiography was performed by confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRA 2;Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), and FAZ damage visible during the FA arterial phase was graded according to the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) FA grading system. Correlations were sought between foveal GCL damage identified on OCT and FA capillary dropout sites. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Foveal GCL damage on OCT, the size of the foveola on OCT (defined as the area of GCL thickness <10 microm), ETDRS grading of FAZ on FA, and visual acuity. RESULTS: Among the 124 eyes with diabetic retinopathy, 62 (50%) had FA evidence of either FAZ damage higher than grade 1 or FAZ capillary loss. In these eyes, damage to the FAZ seen on FA also could be detected on OCT (positive predictive value, 84.5%; negative predictive value, 72.9%), and locations of FAZ damage seen on FA corresponded well with sites of foveal GCL damage on OCT. In nondiabetic, normal eyes, the size of the foveola on OCT matched the size of the FAZ on FA. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of foveal GCL damage on OCT is a good indicator of macular ischemic damage in eyes with diabetic retinopathy. Although in this study FA was more sensitive than OCT in detecting vascular damage, OCT provides objective results and seems to be a good noninvasive substitute for FA.

Chalazion

Pseudorheumatoid nodule 

Necrobiotic Xanthogranuloma with paraproteinemia

Silica granuloma of the eyelid

Leishmaniasis

Molluscum Contagiosum