HISTOPATHOLOGY INDIA.COM

                      Myxoid Tumours of Soft Tissue

 
November 2009
Histopathology-India.net

diagnostichistopathology. blogspot.com

Pathopedia-India.com

Surgical-Pathology.com

Pathology-India.com

Pancreatic Pathology Online

Gall Bladder Pathology Online

Paediatric Pathology Online

Paraganglioma-Online

Endocrine Pathology Online

Eye Pathology Online

Ear Pathology Online

Cardiac Path Online

Lung Tumour-Online

Mesothelioma-Online

Pulmonary Pathology Online

Nutritional Pathology Online

Environmental Pathology Online

Pathology Quiz Online

Dermpath-India

GI Path Online

Soft Tissue Pathology

Case Index

Infectious Disease Online; INDEX: A-D ; INDEX: E-L ; INDEX: M-P INDEX: Q-Z ; FUNGAL DISEASE ; VIRAL DISEASE.

E-book - History of  Medicine with special reference to India

Basic Pathology Blog

Environmental Pathology- Smoking

 

Cigarette smoking and Cardio vascular Disease  

Cigarette smoking and Cancer

Non-Neoplastic Diseases in Smokers

Cigarette Smoking and diseases in Women

Environmental Pathology- Alcoholism (Mechanism of Tissue Injury)

Complication of Chronic Alcoholism

Environmental Pathology- Drug Abuse

Environmental Pathology - Iatrogenic Drug Injury:  

Iatrogenic Drug Injury - Oral contraceptives

Environmental Pathology - Effect of Chemicals

Toxic effect of volatile organic solvents and vapors

Toxic effect of agricultural chemicals

Environmental Pathology - Toxic effect of Metal

Lead Intoxication

Mercury Exposure

Arsenic

Cadmium

Nickel

Iron

Environmental Pathology - Physical Agents  

Environmental Pathology-Thermal Regulatory Dysfunction

Environmental Pathology - Hypothermia

Environmental Pathology - Hyperthermia

Environmental Pathology- Electrical Burns

Environmental Pathology- Altitude Related Illnesses

Environmental Pathology - Physical Injuries

Anatomy and Histology of the Normal Lung and Airways

Examination of pulmonary and pleural biopsies

Useful chromatic and immunostains in pulmonary pathology

Percutaneous Needle and Trucut Biopsy Specimen

Bronchial Biopsy Specimen

Transbronchial Biopsy Specimen

Transbronchial biopsy in lung transplant recipients

Open lung biopsy

Lobectomy and pneumonectomy specimen

Histopathological reporting of pulmonary parenchymal biopsies

Histopathological reporting of pulmonary biopsies in cases of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Closed pleural biopsy  ;Open pleural biopsy 

Anatomical Distribution of Pulmonary Disease

Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid  Malformation

Bronchopulmonary Sequestration

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Complications of Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Sarcoidosis

Extrinsic Allergic Alveolitis 

Pulmonary Eosinophilic Granuloma

Pathological Diagnosis of Granulomatous Lung Diseases

Infectious Granuloma of the Lung

Non-necrotising Granulomatous Inflammation of  the lung

Histopathological Examination of Pulmonary Granulomatous Inflammation

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Usual Interstitial Pneumonia

Non-specific interstitial  pneumonia 

Desquamative interstitial pneumonia

Respiratory bronchiolitis-interstitial lung disease (RBILD)

Acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP)/organizing diffuse alveolar damage (DAD)

Lymphocytic Interstitial Pneumonia / Follicular Bronchiolitis

Pulmonary Vasculitis

Pneumoconiosis

Silicosis

Asbestosis

Coal Pneumoconiosis

Talcosis

Exfoliative Pulmonary Cytology

                         

We can define radiation simply as the emission of energy by one body, its transmission through an intervening medium, and its absorption by another body.

By this definition, radiation encompasses the entire electromagnetic spectrum and certain charged particles emitted by radioactive elements.

Alfa particles, such as the radiation emitted by phosphorus-32, and the beta particles of elements such as tritium and carbon-14 are of immense use scientifically and diagnostically but pose few hazards for man.

High energy radiation, in the form of gamma or x-rays is the mediator of most of the biologic effects.

Radiation can be employed in a benign or malignant manner.

On the one hand, medical practice is inconceivable today without the use of diagnostic and therapeutic radioisotopes, clinical radiographs, and radiation therapy. On the other hand, nuclear explosions and accidental exposure to radiation in nuclear power plants have caused injury and death.

Radiation is quantitated in a number of ways.

The emission of radiant energy from a source is measured in roentgens, units that refer to the amount of ionization produced in air.  The absorption of radiant energy - biologically, the more important parameter - is measured in terms  of the rad, the unit that defines the ergs of energy absorbed by a tissue.

A newer international unit is the Gray, which corresponds to 100 rads.

Because low-energy particles produce more biologic damage than gamma or x-rays, the rem unit was introduced to describe the biologic effect produced by a rad of high-energy radiation.

At the cellular level, radiation essentially has two effects: a somatic effect, associated with acute cell killing, and its induction of genetic damage.

Radiation-induced cell death,  is attributed to the acute effects of the radiolysis of water.

The production of activated oxygen species results in lipid peroxidation, membrane injury, and possibly an interaction with macromolecules of the cell.

Genetic damage to the cell, whether caused by direct absorption of energy by DNA (the target theory) or caused indirectly by a reaction of DNA with oxygen radicals, is expressed either as mutation or as reproductive failure. Both mutation and reproductive failure may lead to delayed cell death, and the former is incriminated in the development of radiation-induced neoplasia.

The differential sensitivity of tissues to radiation has been recognized for years. For example, the intestine and the hematopoietic bone marrow are far more vulnerable to radiation than tissues such as bone and brain.

These differences should not be construed as a reflection of variable sensitivity to acute cell killing (even though there may be slight differences in the acute, somatic response of cells to radiation based on anti-oxidant and other metabolic defenses).

The important consideration is that the vulnerability of a tissue to radiation-induced damage depends on its proliferative rate, which in turn correlates with the natural life span of the constituent cells.

Damage to the DNA of a long-lived, nonproliferating cell does not necessarily pose a threat to its function or viability because the reproductive and metabolic functions of the cell are distinct.

By contrast, a short-lived, proliferating cell such as an intestinal crypt cell or a hematopoietic precursors, must be rapidly replaced by division of the stem cells and the committed precursor.

When radiation-induced DNA damage precludes mitosis of these cells, the mature elements are no longer replaced and the tissue can no longer function.

Except for unusual circumstances, as in the massive irradiation that precedes bone marrow transplantation, significant levels of whole-body irradiation result only from industrial accidents or from the explosion of nuclear weapons.

By contrast, localized irradiation is an inevitable byproduct of any diagnostic radiologic procedure, and it is the intended result of radiotherapy.

Acute somatic cell death occurs only with extremely high doses of radiation, well in excess of 1000 rads. It is morphologically indistinguishable from the coagulative necrosis produced by other causes.  Irreversible damage to the replicative capacity of cells requires far lower doses, possibly as little as 50 rads.

Whole-Body Irradiation: click here

Localized Radiation Injury Associated with Radiotherapy: click here

Radiation and Cancer: click here

Microwave and Ultrasound Radiation:

Microwave, produced by ovens, radar, and diathermy, are electromagnetic waves that penetrate tissue but do not produce ionization.

Unlike x- and gamma radiation, the absorption of microwave energy produces only heat. Thus exposure to microwave radiation under ordinary circumstances is highly unlikely to produce any injury.

Ultrasound, the vibrational waves in air above the audible range, produce mechanical compression but, again, no ionization. Highly focused and energetic ultrasound devices are used to disrupt tissue in vitro for chemical analysis and to clean various surfaces, including teeth. However, there is no reason to believe that diagnostic ultrasound or accidental exposure to any industrial device results in any measurable damage.

Radiation syndromes: a new look at persisting problems of clinical significance.British Journal of Radiology Supplement_27 (2005),v-vi 

                         

Ophthalmic and adnexal complications of radiotherapy.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 May;85(3):240-50.

The role of radiotherapy in ophthalmic practice continues to grow. This growth has seen an expansion of indications for radiotherapy, a refinement of the modalities that can be used and a reduction in the ocular and adnexal complications that result from this form of therapy. The compendium of indications for radiotherapy in ophthalmology continues to grow and now includes many conditions such as the treatment of lid and adnexal disease, ocular surface disorders and both benign and malignant disease of the posterior segment and optic pathways. The radiotherapeutic modalities employed to manage these conditions are numerous and include both radioactive plaques (brachytherapy) and external beam radiation techniques. New techniques such as stereotactic radiosurgery are delivering benefits in the management of conditions such as optic nerve sheath meningioma, where the treatment of this blinding and occasionally life-threatening intracranial neoplasm now results in fewer adverse affects. The purpose of this review is to give a brief overview of the indications and treatment modalities, and a more in-depth discussion of the potential side-effects when radiotherapy is used for ocular and periorbital disease.

Ionizing radiation and cardiovascular disease.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Sep;1076:309-17.

For more than 15 years the A-bomb survivor studies have shown increased noncancer mortality due to radiation exposures. The most prominent cause of this increase is circulatory disease mortality. Although the estimated relative risk is less than for solid cancers (1.2 versus 1.6 per Sv), there are measurable increases in cardiovascular disease mortality at doses greater than 0.5 Sv. The evidence for circulatory diseases in mortality studies of occupational cohorts exposed to external radiation is less compelling. It is generally accepted that atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease of the arteries and a risk factor for myocardial infarction. Immunological markers for inflammatory disease have been shown to be dose related in A-bomb survivors. Evidence from animal studies reveals increased cardiovascular mortality and arterial endothelial damage from both neutron and, to a lesser extent, gamma exposures.

Low doses of ionizing radiation and circulatory diseases: a systematic review of the published epidemiological evidence.Radiat Res. 2005 Mar;163(3):247-57.

Recent analyses of mortality among atomic bomb survivors have suggested a linear dose-response relationship between ionizing radiation and diseases of the circulatory system for exposures in the range 0-4 Sv. If confirmed, this has substantial implications. We have therefore reviewed the published literature to see if other epidemiological data support this finding. Other studies allowing a comparison of the rates of circulatory disease in individuals drawn from the same population but exposed to ionizing radiation at different levels within the range 0-5 Gy or 0-5 Sv were identified through systematic literature searches. Twenty-six studies were identified. In some, disease rates among those exposed at different levels may have differed for reasons unrelated to radiation exposure, while many had low power to detect effects of the relevant magnitude. Among the remainder, one study found appreciable evidence that exposure to low-dose radiation was associated with circulatory diseases, but five others, all with appreciable power, did not. We conclude that the other epidemiological data do not at present provide clear evidence of a risk of circulatory diseases at doses of ionizing radiation in the range 0-4 Sv, as suggested by the atomic bomb survivors. Further evidence is needed to characterize the possible risk.

Current epidemiological evidence regarding the health effects of low-dose ionizing radiation. Implications for radiation protection, public health and forensic medicine.Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2004 Jan-Apr;60(1-2):81-102.

The health effects of low-dose ionizing radiation have been widely studied, but remain uncertain. Up-to-date knowledge about epidemiologic evidence for potential human health effects of low dose ionizing radiation is important for revising national radiation protection legislation. This review, conducted by a multidisciplinary research team of the Italian Institute of Social Medicine, evaluates epidemiologic studies published since July 2003. After careful selection, a total of 302 studies were reviewed. Greater emphasis was given to papers that analyzed data using standardized incidence and mortality ratios and to studies regarding occupational exposures in all workers, healthcare workers and aircrew members. Nevertheless, studies regarding A-bomb survivors of Hiroshima/Nagasaki, Chernobyl cleanup workers, patients exposed for medical reasons, and workers in nuclear plants were also included. Given the limitations of epidemiological studies and excluding the cosmic rays context, which requires further research, the authors conclude that harmful effects from exposures to ionizing radiation at doses lower than 100 mSv cannot be ruled out. Nevertheless, if any harmful health effects do exist, they are certainly very small. The implications for radiation protection, public health and forensic medicine are discussed.

Radiation and cardiovascular diseases.J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2004;23(2):99-106

Both epidemiological and experimental evidence emphasize the connection between radiation exposure and cancer. Little effort has been directed toward finding an association between radiation and cardiovascular diseases. Lately, studies on the A-bomb survivors and Chernobyl accident victims have indicated that radiation doses as low as 0.05-1.0 Gy could be responsible for an increase in the incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Exposures to high doses of radiation (approximately 10-40 Gy) have also been reported to induce atherosclerotic lesions in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Earlier studies in experimental animals have shown that radiation, mostly at high doses (>5 Gy), could accelerate the formation of atherosclerotic lesions. This article provides an up-to-date review of the literature connecting cardiovascular diseases to radiation exposures, particularly at low doses, and the potential implications of this connection in radiation risk assessment.

Epidemiological data and radiation risk estimates.Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2002 Jan;50(1):27-39.

The results of several major epidemiology studies on populations with particular exposure to ionizing radiation should become available during the first years of the 21(st) century. These studies are expected to provide answers to a number of questions concerning public health and radiation protection. Most of the populations concerned were accidentally exposed to radiation in ex-USSR or elsewhere or in a nuclear industrial context. The results will complete and test information on risk coming from studies among survivors of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs, particularly studies on the effects of low dose exposure and prolonged low-dose exposure, of different types of radiation, and environmental and host-related factors which could modify the risk of radiation-induced effects. These studies are thus important to assess the currently accepted scientific evidence on radiation protection for workers and the general population. In addition, supplementary information on radiation protection could be provided by formal comparisons and analyses combining data from populations with different types of exposure. Finally, in order to provide pertinent information for public health and radiation protection, future epidemiology studies should be targeted and designed to answer specific questions, concerning, for example, the risk for specific populations (children, patients, people with genetic predisposition). An integrated approach, combining epidemiology and studies on the mechanisms of radiation induction should provide particularly pertinent information.

Custom Search


  Disclaimer  ;  Privacy Policy  ; Advertising Policy  ;  E-mail 

Copyright © 2009 surgical-pathology.com
   All rights reserved