|
Benign salivary gland-type tumors of the
bronchus: expression of high molecular weight cytokeratins.
Ann Pathol. 2006 Feb;26(1):30-4.
Primary lung
tumors showing features of salivary gland-type neoplasms are extremely
rare, and their immunohistochemical profile has been seldom studied.
We report two cases of bronchial pleomorphic and mucous gland adenomas
and study the expression of markers such as TTF-1 and high molecular
weight keratins in these tumors. Both tumors were endobronchial. The
pleomorphic adenoma also had a well-circumscribed parenchymal
component, with a biphasic morphology composed of epithelial and
myoepithelial cells in a background of myxoid and hyaline stroma. The
mucous gland adenoma displayed papillary and dilated glandular
structures. In both cases, epithelial cells showed strong and diffuse
cytoplasmic staining with high molecular weight cytokeratins (cytokeratin
5/6 and keratin 903), and lacked TTF-1 expression. This immunoprofile
provides useful clues for the histogenesis of pulmonary benign
salivary gland-type adenomas and helps in distinguishing them from
primary adenocarcinomas in small biopsy specimens.
Salivary
gland-type tumors with myoepithelial differentiation arising in
pulmonary hamartoma: report of 2 cases of a hitherto unrecognized
association.Am
J Surg Pathol. 2006 Mar;30(3):375-87.
Reported is a
hitherto unrecognized association of pulmonary hamartomas with
salivary gland-type tumors showing myoepithelial differentiation,
namely, a case of myoepithelioma arising in a otherwise classic
hamartoma with cartilage predominance, and a case of malignant mixed
tumor arising in a predominantly fibrous hamartoma resembling
müllerian adenofibroma. The tumors occurred in middle-aged female
patients of 35 and 44 years, respectively, and presented as 7 cm
(treated with lobectomy) and 13 cm (treated with pneumonectomy) masses
of the right upper lobe showing a short clinical history of cough,
dyspnea, and wheezing. Both lesions did not present regional lymph
node metastases after mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The myoepithelioma
patient was well with no signs of recurrent disease at 6-month
clinical control, but she was then lost to follow-up; the malignant
mixed tumor patient is alive and well after 6 months since operation.
Both tumors presented with morphologic and immunohistochemical
features of myoepithelial cells, and we interpret them as being
derived from a myoepithelial-like stromal cell population found within
the hamartomatous areas, which is also consistently detected in
classic pulmonary hamartoma. The lack of individual cell necrosis,
mitotic activity, cell atypia, and pulmonary parenchyma infiltration
supported a diagnosis of benign or unproven malignant potential tumor
for the myoepithelioma, whereas the reverse held true for the other
tumor in which the diagnosis of malignant mixed tumor of the lung was
rendered. Their main importance of recognizing this association lies
in separating these tumors histologically from other monophasic or
biphasic tumors, either primary or secondary, such as pulmonary
sarcomatoid carcinomas or true sarcomas, and metastatic salivary gland
tumors, spindle cell carcinomas, melanomas, and soft tissue and
visceral sarcomas.
Salivary-type
neoplasms of the breast and lung.Semin
Diagn Pathol. 2003 Nov;20(4):279-304.
Salivary-type
tumors occur in multiple sites in the human body, likely related to a
basic structural homology between exocrine glands in these different
anatomic areas. This paper reviews these salivary gland tumor types in
breast tissue and lung. Salivary-type tumors of both breast and lung
are relatively uncommon in comparison to their salivary gland
counterparts. This may be attributable in part to lack of familiarity
with these tumors in extra-salivary sites, and in part to histologic
overlap with other primary and metastatic tumor types. Recognition of
these entities is improving as the clinical and pathologic features
are better delineated, and tumors are more accurately classified.
Prediction of malignant behavior is not always possible in these
unusual sites. In some instances, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma,
behavior is known to differ considerably from that of analogous
primary salivary gland tumors and in other instances there are simply
too few reported cases to allow for adequate prognostication. In fact,
more recent papers discuss the need to consider a spectrum
encompassing benign and malignant lesions, in both breast and lung. Of
course, some entities show clear-cut evidence of malignancy with
documented potential for metastasis, others show bland features and
well-reported benign behavior, and the less well-defined entities
reside between these two extremes. The molecular pathology of salivary
gland tumors has been reasonably well investigated in that location;
however; there are few molecular studies devoted to salivary-type
tumors of the breast and lung. This represents a potential area for
future growth in further clarifying these tumors and their behavior.
Primary salivary
gland-type tumors of the lung. Semin Diagn Pathol 1995;12:106–122
Primary
pulmonary neoplasms that bear similar histopathologic features to
those seen in salivary glands are rare. Although their presence has
been well documented in the literature, it has been primarily in the
form of single case reports. Consequently, it has been difficult until
recently to determine their prevalence, clinical behavior, treatment,
and spectrum of histopathologic features. Moreover, because of the
rarity with which these tumors occur, one needs to be familiar with
their diverse histopathologic features to comfortably arrive at the
correct diagnosis. Because of their close histological similarities to
their salivary gland counterparts, careful clinical evaluation is
necessary to establish the primary nature of these tumors in the lung
and to rule out the possibility of a metastasis. Another feature that
may generate difficulties in interpretation is that some of these
tumors may share certain histopathologic and some immunohistochemical
features with each other. This may pose a serious problem,
particularly when dealing with small biopsy samples. Therefore, the
use of special studies such as electron microscopy and routine
histochemistry may be beneficial and must be used in addition to
conventional microscopy and immunohistochemistry to corroborate the
diagnosis. In essence, the diagnosis of these tumors requires a
combined approach that must include a detailed clinical history, a
reasonably sized sample for histopathologic evaluation, histochemical
and immunohistochemical studies, and an ultrastructural examination.
|