|
Desmoplastic
tricholemmoma of the eyelid misdiagnosed as sebaceous carcinoma: a
potential diagnostic pitfall.
BACKGROUND:
Sebaceous carcinoma (SC) most commonly presents on the eyelid and is
frequently misdiagnosed both clinically and pathologically. Only
very rare cases of desmoplastic tricholemmoma (DTL) of the eyelid
have been reported. Methods: We present a case of DTL of the eyelid
initially misdiagnosed as an invasive SC. RESULTS: A 55-year-old man
presented with a rapidly growing 5 mm erythematous lesion on his
upper eyelid. Histologic examination showed a lobular,
folliculocentric proliferation of palely eosinophilic to clear cells
surrounded by peripheral basal cells with palisading. The central
portion of the lesion appeared infiltrative with clear cells
surrounded by a thickened basement embedded in a dense, collagenous
stroma. However, the cells showed mostly uniform cytoplasmic
clearing, lacking the multivacuolization or nuclear scalloping of
sebocytes. In addition, a periodic acid Schiff stain was positive
with diastase sensitivity, indicating cytoplasmic glycogen, not
lipid. CD34 immunohistochemical staining was also positive, which
has been reported in DTL but not in SC. CONCLUSIONS: SC is often
misdiagnosed as other entities, but misidentification of other
neoplasms as SC is less common; however, this is an important
diagnostic pitfall, as it may result in unnecessary and disfiguring
surgical treatment and consequent medical-legal liability.
Therefore, DTL should enter the differential diagnosis of clear-cell
neoplasms on the eyelid.
Sebaceous
carcinoma of the eyelids: a review of 21 cases.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007 Oct 30.
BACKGROUND:
Sebaceous carcinoma is a malignant neoplasm that arises from the
sebaceous glands and occurs most often in the eyelids. A tumour
diameter exceeding 10mm indicates a grave prognosis. However, thus
far, no study has used the T classification of the tumour, node,
metastasis (TNM) staging system to determine the prognosis. In this
article, we studied the management and outcomes of sebaceous
carcinoma using the T classification. METHODS: We report our
experience of sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids in 21 patients
between December 1979 and December 2003. We employed the method of T
classification and assessed the management and clinical outcomes in
patients with sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids. RESULTS: The
sample included three T1, six T2, five T3, and seven T4 cases. All
the cases were managed by surgery. The follow-up periods ranged from
22 to 123 months. The mean and the median were 70.7 and 62 months,
respectively. At the time of the last follow up, 12 of the 21
patients were alive. Five deaths were secondary to the tumour and
four were unrelated. Most importantly, none of the T1, T2, or T3
patient deaths were secondary to the tumour. However, all the
patients that died as a result of the tumour were of the T4 type.
The cause-specific cumulative survival rate over five years was
78.9%; however, that of the T4 type was 42.9%. CONCLUSION: None of
the T1, T2, or T3 patients died as a result of the tumour, which
indicates a good prognosis. However, the cases of the T4 type had a
grave prognosis. Therefore, the T classification alone may be an
important factor in determining the prognosis for sebaceous
carcinoma of the eyelids. |